Is Nikon D40 A Good Camera For Infrared Conversion

Infrared, or "IR" photography, offers photographers of all abilities and budgets the opportunity to explore a new world – the world of the unseen. Why "unseen"? Considering our eyes literally cannot see IR lite, as it lies just beyond what is classified every bit the "visible" spectrum – that which human eyesight can detect. When we take photographs using infrared-equipped film or cameras, we are exposed to the world that can often look very different from that nosotros are accustomed to seeing. Colors, textures, leaves and plants, human skin, and all other manner of objects tin can reflect IR light in unique and interesting ways, ones that cannot be mimicked with tools such as Photoshop (yes – there are limits to what Photoshop can do!).

Like any form of photography or art, however, information technology is a matter of taste. I would strongly urge people to explore the world of IR. As the number of cameras-equipped devices proliferates and the associated technologies improve, IR photography may offering the opportunity for photographers to expand into new arenas and differentiate their offerings from those of others.

Terminology

For purposes of this article, I will refer to the infrared light spectrum every bit "near-infrared", or simply, "IR". Near-infrared refers to the spectrum of low-cal just beyond the range humans can observe with their eyesight. This lite range is between 700 – 1200 nm (nanometers). Some other attribute of the IR spectrum, to a higher place near IR, is associated with thermal imaging. Thermal engineering was popularized by movies such as, "Patriot Games" and other thrillers, whereby intelligence agencies or military machine personnel were able to discover villains by measuring their torso heat under nighttime conditions. Today's mutual digital camera sensors are non able to detect thermal images. Under the right circumstances however, digital cameras tin exercise an excellent job of recording IR.

History Of Infrared Photography

The starting time forays into IR photography, using special film plates, began in the early on office of the 20th century. During WWI, IR photography proved extremely valuable, as images using the IR spectrum were not affected as much past atmospheric brume every bit normal photos. IR images were also able to show stark distinctions between vegetation and buildings, better identifying potential enemy targets such as camouflaged munitions factories and other key sites. Rivers, streams, lakes, and other waterways were depicted in a very dark hue, making them much more than obvious.

During the 1930s and 1940s, filmmakers introduced a variety of infrared-sensitive films that attracted both amateur photographers and Hollywood filmmakers. The military machine extended its use of IR photography as well, as it sought every possible reward during WWII. During the 1960s, IR photography saw a number of converts, as some of the leading musicians of the day, such as the Grateful Dead and Jimmy Hendrix, popularized its apply via their psychedelic album covers. With the appearance of the digital camera in the tardily 1990s, both regular and IR photography were nigh to alter essentially. In addition to professional and apprentice photographers, law enforcement officials rely on IR photography to notice forensic evidence not discerned through normal eyesight.

IR Light Qualities

Reflected IR lite produces a fascinating array of surreal effects. Vegetation appears white or about white. Skin takes on a very milky, smoothen texture, although veins shut to the pare surface can be accentuated and take on a rather ghoulish advent. Optics tin can appear a bit ghostly with the irises registering very dark tones and the whites of the eye taking on a grayish hue. Blackness wearable tin can appear grey or white depending on the fabric. IR calorie-free can pass through sunglasses that, to the eye, announced extremely dark or mirror-like (encounter image below). Blue skies have on a much more than dramatic appearance equally well.

The other aspect of IR photos is a bit tougher to describe and classify. I have found that there is a certain blazon of contrast, or what I refer to as "crispness", rarely seen in normal photography. Loftier contrast B&W images are the closest in nature to IR photography, merely fifty-fifty those don't seem to accept the same look and feel as IR images. These effects and others are what provide the magic of IR photography – only nearly everything looks very different from what you are used to seeing within the visible light spectrum.

IR light passing through sunglasses and pare smoothing event

IR Photography Options

35mm IR film is still readily available for as piffling every bit $11 for a roll of 36 prints. It is easy enough to use in your existing SLR, thus enabling you lot to experiment with IR photography, without committing to annihilation more than a whorl or two of film, and some development costs. Depending on your lab'southward capabilities, however, you may find that you have to ship the IR motion picture to another lab that has the ability to process it, much as is required for high-stop B&W moving-picture show.

Another culling requires buying a circular IR filter (similar to a UV or round polarizing filter) that attaches to the front end of your camera lens. The IR filter prevents visible light from passing through while but allowing IR light to strike your camera's sensor. These filters will vary in price depending on the size of the filter and the specific portion of the IR spectrum they address. The main difference between the filters is how colors are rendered (more on this in a chip), but this is primarily a matter of taste. Spending more money on a filter that focuses on a dissimilar function of the IR spectrum doesn't necessarily guarantee that you will like the results more than an IR filter costing much less.

What are the downsides of using an IR filter that attaches to your lens? The primary issue is motion mistiness. Since your DSLR has an IR blocking filter in front end of it, very footling, if any, IR light reaches it. The IR filter allows only IR light to reach your sensor while filtering out the visible calorie-free. The combination of the IR blocking filter and the IR filter on the front of your lens requires very long exposure times. Since the IR filter is very dark, you also take to focus before attaching the IR filter to your lens.

The specific exposure time will vary based on the specific IR filter used, sensitivity of the camera sensor to IR, the specifics of the DSLR'southward blocking filter, and of form, the corporeality of IR low-cal. When I get-go experimented with IR photography using my Pentax K10D in 2007, I institute that I needed to leave my shutter open for 45-60 seconds on a sunny summer twenty-four hour period to become a properly exposed IR photo. That might be fine if yous are taking photos of buildings or other inanimate objects, but doesn't piece of work and so well with anything that moves, such as people, animals, leaves, flowers, etc. But if you desire to go into IR photography speedily with minimal investment, y'all could purchase an IR filter such as the Hoya R72 for as little as $64 (depending on the filter size required) and decide if it is for you. The R72 is probably the almost pop IR filter, since it addresses a broad spectrum of the IR range, is economic, and produces excellent IR images.

The last option is to take a DSLR converted for exclusive IR utilize. This is more costly, merely it produces the best results and offers the most flexibility.

DSLRs Converted For Dedicated IR Photography

This option requires the IR blocking filter that sits in front end of your DSLR's sensor to exist removed, and substituted with one that allows but IR lite to be passed through. Information technology is the equivalent of taking the external IR filter I previously described and substituting it for the IR blocking filter. What are the benefits of this approach? You can utilise your DSLR just as you do today, relying on normal exposure values and shutter speeds. Looking over my IR photo metadata, I have found that on a typical sunny day from May through August, at f/8 and ISO 100, I achieved shutter speeds of at least 1/125 and often much college. No long exposures, no time focusing so needing to shift your focus style from AF to transmission, no little with IR filters on the front of your lens. Most chiefly – no blurred images.

The cons of using a defended IR camera are cost, the inability to utilise the converted camera for anything other than IR photography, and voiding your DSLR's warranty (gulp!). Y'all have two options relative to converting a DSLR for IR utilise:

1. Send it to a reputable IR conversion company
2. Do it yourself

I would strongly recommend pick one unless you are comfortable with the following: watching an instructional video, existence very comfortable with very minor, sensitive electric components (heavy-duty consumers of caffeine tin stop hither!), disassembling your camera to reach the sensor in an ultra-make clean environment, removing the IR blocking filter, replacing information technology with the IR filter obtained from the conversion company, putting your camera dorsum together, and dealing with any trivial issues such as… dust, hairs, and other particles getting in your camera, as well as any operational issues encountered by some attribute of the disassembly/associates process. While I take seen the instructional video, and corresponded with a number of people that have performed this performance, I would simply say that it is not for the faint of heart!

There are a variety of companies that specialize in infrared conversion services. One of the virtually well-known is Lifepixel. I used Lifepixel on two occasions and have null but praise for the professionalism of their staff and the quality of their work. Lifepixel first converted my Nikon D40X. Two years later, I sent them my D90. I have to acknowledge that I felt quite a bit of trepidation when I offset shipped my Nikon D40X to Lifepixel. The D40X was brand new and I didn't even accept a unmarried picture with it earlier sending it off in a well-padded box. Something did not experience right about sending a brand new camera to someone other than Nikon to disassemble, modify, and in the process, voiding my warranty!

Earlier doing and then, even so, I spoke extensively with Daniel, one of Lifepixels client back up representatives. I emailed him with an exhaustive listing of questions and concerns. Daniel was extremely patient and thoroughly addressed every issue I raised. Other Lifepixel representatives were only as responsive and helpful. And in nearly 4 years of shooting IR, I can't point to a single problem with either of the IR-converted DSLRs. One give-and-take of caution – whichever visitor you select for your IR conversion, make sure that you investigate them thoroughly and experience confident in having them alter your DSLR.

Capturing IR Images

Since the DSLR has been modified for IR simply purposes, yous can use it just as you did when photographing images within the visible low-cal spectrum. ISO, shutter speed and aperture combinations will work in conjunction with one another just as they practice with whatever non-IR DSLR. Matrix metering is always a safe bet with IR, although you lot may want to experiment with your camera, lens, and lighting conditions to determine if center-weighted metering provides improve results in a given state of affairs.

My D40x required me to adjust the exposure compensation push at times, dialing up/down past as much as one.vii. Normally, the range of aligning was smaller – +/- .3 – .7. Although I have the same IR filter on my D90 however, I have noticed that the D90 requires much less adjustment of the exposure bounty. This was likely a consequence of the D90 and D40X using unlike camera sensors. Information technology takes a chip of trial and mistake to understand what a "good" RAW paradigm looks like in your LCD. With time, however, you will come up to recognize when you have properly exposed an IR image and if y'all need to adjust the exposure compensation.

What Nearly Lenses?

We are trained to believe that the best lenses will produce the all-time results. Yet, in the world of IR, the lens that works best in the visible spectrum can be a complete dud in the world of IR. Conversely, lower-cost lenses may perform much better than their counterparts. The main flaws with poor IR performing lenses are twofold; producing a hotspot in the middle of the image (slightly different exposure and colors than the rest of the image), and existence more susceptible to flare. You may minimize the advent of the hotspot in post-processing, but it tin can have quite a bit of work.

And simply every bit with flares associated with the visible calorie-free spectrum, IR flares cannot easily be fixed without extensive Photoshop work. Worse, IR flares are harder to detect. When photographing in the visible light spectrum, you can ofttimes tell when you are on the verge of introducing a flare based on the angle of the lens relative to the sun. With IR however, you don't always receive the same visible cue, since you tin't see IR light. Thus it is important to cheque your LCD as you shoot IR to ensure that you are not introducing flares into your photos since you cannot trust your eyes.

The best strategy is to apply lenses that are known to work well for IR photography. Such knowledge isn't easy to see. While y'all can always find a myriad of quality lens reviews, few, if any, accost the issue of IR performance. One such source is Bjorn Rorslett's site. Roreslett is one of the few that specifically tests lenses for IR apply. As you can meet from his site, the humble Nikon 18-55mm is an excellent performer compared to some other lenses costing a healthy multiple of its price. Over the years, I have come up to rely heavily on my Nikon 16-85mm VR. Information technology rarely comes off my infrared D90, since it provides excellent IR performance, is extremely sharp, and has a very useful zoom range that covers only about anything I would wish to capture. And since I have a diversity of lenses and experimented with their IR operation, I tin vouch for many of Roreslett'south IR recommendations.

Processing IR Images

RAW files afford the well-nigh flexibility for post-processing IR images, only as they do for photos taken with visible lite. The RAW images viewed straight from the camera are non very impressive – dull, pink in colour, lacking in dissimilarity. RAW images from an infrared DSLR would likely non persuade many people to delve much deeper into this style of photography. The IR prototype below (Pennsylvania Memorial in Gettysburg, PA) possesses a decent contrast level, but others can appear blander or "dirty".

What gives information technology this pinkish tone? A number of factors influence the look of the RAW IR paradigm – the specific DSLR sensor used, the IR filter installed on the DSLR by the IR conversion company, and software algorithms used for white balance top the list. IR images really have no color to them, but your DSLR'due south sensor has to assign something to the red, dark-green, and blue sensors associated with the Bayer pattern. While each camera's IR images will appear slightly different than those of others, nearly modern DSLRs will produce a RAW file that looks somewhat like to the paradigm above.

I process my IR images in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, using a preset that serves as a good starting betoken for adjusting the white balance, tone, dissimilarity, sharpening, etc. The most of import of these settings is the white residue, which I set to a temperature of 2100 and a tint of -72. The resultant image looks like the one beneath. Now the image is shaping up and looks much better than the ocean of pink from the original RAW file. Warning: Irresolute the white balance settings of IR images can result in some desperate psychedelic experiences!

I and then import the paradigm higher up into Adobe Photoshop CS5, where I accept created a few actions that swap the cerise and blue channels to varying degrees. I am partial to a series of deportment that result in a mixture of blue and xanthous colors. How did I go far at these settings? Pure experimentation… When I find a particular expect that I like, I speedily create a Photoshop activity while I accept all the settings in plain view and can recall the associated steps. Sometimes I will reduce the color saturation depending on what I am attempting to accomplish and/or the nature of the image in question. Other times, I volition change the hue of a given color. Again, since IR does not contain any real colors, those that y'all come across are the result of a myriad of factors that will vary from camera to camera. Thus my Lightroom presets and Photoshop actions might produce somewhat different results if applied to photos taken with your specific IR converted photographic camera make and model.

Below is the terminal version, afterward some additional processing, dissonance reduction, and sharpening:

Summary

IR photography opens up exciting new worlds for photographers to explore, particularly because the flexibility that IR converted DSLRs provide. This article is only an introduction to the various issues and considerations associated with IR. If you would like to sympathize more about this discipline, driblet me a note below, and I will be sure to encompass additional aspects of IR photography in future manufactures.

Update:
Since I wrote this article and others related to infrared photography, many people take emailed me with questions related to IR and advice regarding IR conversion services. Over the terminal few years, I take recommended Kolari Vision. Kolari Vision has converted 4 DSLRs for me. I accept been very impressed with the quality of the service, turnaround fourth dimension, value, and performance of the IR converted DSLRs. Ilija Melentijevic, Kolari Vision's founder, has been especially patient and helpful in explaining the technical and nuanced aspects of converting and using digital cameras for infrared photography. Kolari Vision offers a total range of infrared, ultraviolet, and other specialized digital camera solutions and related filters.

Source: https://photographylife.com/introduction-to-infrared-photography

Posted by: andradefirsay1991.blogspot.com

Share this post